[dcl.pre] Fix order of -> void and static consteval in lambda
#8497
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eisenwave
added
the
P1-Important
Member
|
P1. Normative wording defect. Looking at https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.lambda.general#nt:lambda-declarator, the fix looks correct. |
Contributor
|
Agreed, looks like a simple error in the paper. Thanks! |
tkoeppe
removed
the
P1-Important
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The trailing-return-type of the equivalent-to lambda expression needs to appear after the lambda-specifier-seq.
This is probably an error in P2996R13 which wasn't fixed when applied to the working draft.